久久精品99久久|国产剧情网站91|天天色天天干超碰|婷婷五天月一av|亚州特黄一级片|亚欧超清无码在线|欧美乱码一区二区|男女拍拍免费视频|加勒比亚无码人妻|婷婷五月自拍偷拍

寫作作文

Issue寫作

時(shí)間:2022-10-09 12:09:41 寫作作文 我要投稿
  • 相關(guān)推薦

Issue寫作范文

  Which is a more productive method of performing a group task: allowing ail group members to share in the decision making, duties and responsibilities, or appointing one member to make decisions, delegate duties and take responsibility? The speakers opinion is that the first method is always the best one. In my view, however, each of these alternatives is viable in certain circumstances, as illustrated by two very different examples.

  A jury in a criminal trial is good example of a group in which shared decision-making, duties, and responsibility is the most appropriate and effective way to get the job done. Each member of the jury is on equal footing with the others. While one person is appointed to head the jury, his or her function is to act as facilitator, not as leader. To place ultimate authority and responsibility on the facilitator would essentially be to appoint a judge, and to thereby defeat the very purpose of the jury system.

  By way of contrast, a trauma unit in a hospital is a case in which one individual should assume responsibility, delegate duties and make decisions. In trauma units, split-second decisions are inherently part of the daily routine, and it is generally easier for one person to make a quick decision than for a team to agree on how to proceed. One ould argue that since decisions in trauma units are typically life-and-death ones, leaving these decisions to one person is too risky. However, this argument ignores the crucial point that only the most experienced individuals should be trusted with such a burden and with such power; leaving decisions to inexperienced group members can jeopardize a patients very life.

【Issue寫作】相關(guān)文章:

英語作文:Issue10-10

issue英語作文10-10

有關(guān)Issue的英語作文10-10

英語作文推薦:Issue10-10

寫作技巧和寫作手法的區(qū)別09-22

新聞寫作消息稿寫作技巧07-25

新聞寫作綜合消息寫作及范文11-13

寫作的作文01-16

寫作手法11-15

寫作素材11-04